Should drivers have a say in shaping the technical regulations?

Originally published by F1Technical
View original →
11 May 2026, 19:00
Should drivers have a say in shaping the technical regulations?

Should drivers have a say in shaping the technical regulations?

By on

The debate over how much influence Formula 1 drivers should wield in shaping future technical regulations have recently resurfaced, as senior team figures were asked whether the sport is entering a new era of “driver power.”

With several drivers now directly involved in FIA working groups — including those representing Williams, Ferrari and Audi — the question put to James Vowles, Mattia Binotto and Frédéric Vasseur was simple: should drivers play a role in defining the rules, and could their interests ever diverge from those of the teams?

Williams team principal James Vowles was unequivocal in his support, stressing that the drivers involved in the FIA’s discussions were motivated by the health of the sport rather than narrow team advantage.

“I can comment on the drivers that I have. The interests are for that of the sport. I mean, I’m sort of pragmatic to it and again, it’s easy for me to talk about because we’re not at the sharp end right now. But the reason why we’re successful commercially is the sport is in an absolutely great place and I still think the sport is in a great place and growing year on year.

“And Alex and Carlos reflect that in their comments that I go out with it. So, it’s not tailored to what will make Williams better. It is tailored to what they want to get the most out of it in terms of drivers and what they believe will be the right product for the sport. And I think as long as we approach it from that angle, there’s no issue.” For Vowles, the drivers’ input is not only legitimate but aligned with the broader interests of Formula 1.

Audi’s Head of F1 Project Mattia Binotto offered a more structural perspective, emphasising that while drivers are being heard more clearly, the authority over regulations remains firmly with the FIA. “First, I think we should remember that there is a governance body, FIA, who are writing the regulations. No one else is writing the regulations.

“And when you look as well at 2031, which will be out of the Concorde Agreement, once again they will be the one fully deciding what’s the future. I think FIA is simply listening to everyone at the moment to make sure that whatever they are proposing is going in the right direction, and I think that it’s a proper process.”

Binotto rejected the idea that drivers now wield disproportionate influence, arguing instead that the FIA is simply consulting more widely during a period of major regulatory change. “So, I don’t think that drivers will have more influence than in the past. Simply, they are listened to, as they may have been listened to as well in the past, which is, as I said again, a healthy process.

“We are in a situation where it’s a brand-new regulation, really brand new, a lot different to the past, and I think that simply FIA again is doing the right job by listening, hearing, discussing, putting people around the table, technicians, engineers, Team Principals, drivers.

“As I think Fréd said before, it’s already difficult to change our regulation during the season and that has happened. And it has happened because we had a broad consensus around the changes, and the only way to achieve it somehow is to make sure that we have well listened to everyone and found a common ground.”

Ferrari team principal Frédéric Vasseur echoed that sentiment, highlighting that drivers have always been part of the technical feedback loop — and that their involvement is essential when the sport is undergoing significant regulatory evolution.

“Not that much to add, except that for sure the drivers, they are involved from day one into the discussion because the feedback that we as a team have from the car and so on, it’s also built up on the experience of the drivers. It means that they are completely part of the discussion.”

Vasseur also praised the governance structure that allowed mid‑season changes to be agreed unanimously — something he admitted he did not expect. “And then keep in mind that we have a governance. If the sport is going well today, it’s also because the governance is working and that we were able to do changes.

“Honestly, I was very surprised that we could achieve something during the season because for me it was something… not a bit strange but a bit exceptional because in this kind of situation, everybody wants to have his own advantage and we were able to move forward in this situation. It was a good step but drivers are fully involved in the discussion.”